Benefits of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) During Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to study the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on chest anatomy and tumor motion in patients receiving radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary or secondary lung tumors, left-sided breast cancer, or liver metastases referred for radiation therapy were trained to breathe with a CPAP device using a face mask to a maximal pressure of 15 cm H2O. Three- and 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation was performed twice for each patient: once with free breathing (FB) and again using CPAP. Volumetric and dosimetric parameters of treatment plans were compared. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 6 withdrew consent before simulation and 3 withdrew because of discomfort. Thus, a total of 40 patients were analyzed. Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) were treated with CPAP based on confirmation of the volumetric or dosimetric benefit of CPAP. Mean lung volume increased by 37% (P < .001). The mean augmentation was 1283 ± 1128 cm3 (CPAP vs FB; P = .0006) in patients with normal lung function tests and 719 ± 341 cm3 (P = .003) in patients with a restrictive pattern. Increased lung volume was independent of age, body mass index, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking status, and heart disease. Tumor motion in the lung was decreased as reflected in a mean reduction of planning target volume by 19% (P < .001). The greatest reduction of tumor trajectory and planning target volume occurred in tumors in the lower lung, particularly in the range of up to 6 cm above the dome of the diaphragm. The mean lung dose was reduced by 15%, lung V20 by 20%, lung V5 by 11%, and heart V5 by 16% (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective trial, the use of CPAP was associated with significant volumetric and dosimetric benefits compared with FB. CPAP was safe, simple to implement, and well tolerated by most patients, and it should be studied further as a method to reduce the risk of lung and heart toxicity.

Palliative radiation therapy for symptomatic advance breast cancer.

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of palliative breast radiation therapy (RT), with single fraction RT compared with fractionated RT. Our study showed that both RT fractionation schemas provide palliation. Single fraction RT allowed for treatment with minimal interference with systemic therapy, whereas fractionated RT provided a more durable palliative response. Due to equivalent palliative response, at our institution we have increasingly been providing single fraction RT palliation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trends in Imaging Workup of the Male Breast: Experience from a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease representing less than 1% of breast cancers. In the absence of a screening program, such as for females, the diagnostic workup is critical for early detection of MBC. OBJECTIVES: To summarize our institutional experience in the workup of male patients referred for breast imaging, emphasizing the clinical, imaging, and histopathological characteristics of the MBC cohort. METHODS: All male patients who underwent breast imaging between 2011 and 2016 in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, radiological, and histopathological data were collected and statistically evaluated. All images were reviewed using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. RESULTS: 178 male patients (average age 61 years, median age 64), underwent breast imaging in our institution. The most common indication for referral was palpable mass (49%) followed by gynecomastia (16%). Imaging included mostly mammography or ultrasound. Biopsies were performed on 56 patients, 38 (68%) were benign and 18 (32%) were malignant. In all, 13 patients had primary breast cancer and 5 had metastatic disease to the breast. Palpable mass at presentation was strongly associated with malignancy (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Mammography and ultrasound remain the leading modalities in breast imaging among males for diagnostic workup of palpable mass, with gynecomastia being the predominant diagnosis. However, presentation with palpable mass was also associated with malignancy. Despite a notable MBC rate in our cohort, the likelihood of cancer is low in young patients and in cases of gynecomastia.